(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 April 20, 1991 TWOSUN.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- Taken from Flying Saucers magazine - February 1965 Courtesy of Ron Barker Co-Sysop of KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- Do We Have A Double Sun? by Henry Rasmusen We definitely DO have TWO SUNS, according to M. F. Malin, of Salt Lake City, who has spent much of his spare time for over forty years in pursuit of such a theory. The possibility of the existence of a double sun in our solar system began for Malin in 1917, when he overhead a conversation between two men, evidently scientists, on a train in New Jersey. The subject of their conversation was the failure of the law of gravitation with respect to the relations of Earth and Sun - their conclusion being that the basis of velocities of bodies in space must be otherwise than that laid down in Newton's PRINCIPIA. Malin was studying sculpture at the time, at the National Academy of Design in New York. This failure of the gravitational law was shocking to him, for even he knew that Newton's mathematical demonstrations in this connection had formed the groundwork of the whole of modern mechanics, engineering and physics. How could the law have failed, when the results of this work were already interwoven throughout the whole structure of science in all its branches? The modern researches of Einstein and others were always said to have enhanced the value of the PRINCIPIA. The matter attracted the young sculptor so greatly that from that time he began to divide his attention about equally between sculpture and astrophysical study, often working far into the night in efforts to improve his meager knowledge of mathematics, and spending his available time poring over astronomical and astrophysical works in the libraries. Quite early in these studies, he found that although Newton had proven his law very successfully in connection with the Earth-Moon system, he had been forced to abandon his efforts to apply it to the relations of Earth and Sun because the sun's distance and dimensions were not known with any degree of accuracy in his time. A couple of centuries later (after 1894), when the sun's distance and size had been agreed upon and established internationally, the apparent discrepancies in the gravitational relations of Earth and Page 1 Sun had become painfully evident. Usuing the sun as a CENTER OF ATTRACTION, with the Earth-Moon system as a unit of measurement, the proper elements of the earth's orbit were readily calculable - but everywhere seemed to be awry. The earth's distance, period and velocity were hopelessly at variance with each other according to the gravitation law, but the distance and period had been established by observation and could not be adjusted. Also, the sun's size in connection with these elements presented an awkward problem. After many a headache over the situation, the calculators of the day had given up, and had conceded that the basis of velocities in Nature must be other than in Newton's work and had offered the poor parody of gravitational relations on the part of Sun and Earth which is current in the astronomy books of today. This was even more intriguing than ever, because it was perfectly clear that this basis of velocities - that is, the amount of material in the body divided by the square of the distance of the attracted particle - literally IS THE LAW OF GRAVITATION, and that upon this point the Newtonian law as a whole must stand or fall. Here was something which could not be thrust aside by denials or contradictions; it was something no mathematician could deny. What could be wrong? And why had the failure seemed to apply ONLY to the relations of Earth and Sun? Malin made some simple calculations which showed that THE SUN HAS LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE VOLUME OF MATERIAL REQUISITE TO ITS EXISTENCE AS THE CENTRAL ATTRACTION OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM, even if its average density were the same as that of the earth. And if its density were only about one-fourth as great as that of the Earth - as the astronomer USUALLY RECKONS - the discrepancy would be all the more hopeless. How could a discordancy of such proportions ever have been glossed over for the public in the astronomy books? People in general, even among the scientists, seemed entirely unaware that the sun-centered theory and the law of gravitation WERE IRRECONCILABLE. No doubt some of the mathematicians knew but could not face the issue, not knowing anything that could be done about it. And WHERE WAS THE REMAINDER OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM? There seemed to be only one possible place in the system. For a body larger than the sun in volume, or the equivalent with unequal densities - a position PERPETUALLY IN ALIGNMENT BEHIND THE SUN AS SEEN FROM THE EARTH, incredible as this might seem at first glance. Page 2 And if there were a relationship between mass and brightness among stars, perhaps THE GREATER STAR WOULD BE BRIGHTER AND HOTTER THAN THE SUN, and there should be some physical signs of its presence. If such a body existed, the planetary system would revolve around a center of gravity SITUATED BETWEEN THE TWO, SOME DISTANCE BEYOND THE SUN. It was not very difficult to calculate the proper radius of Earth's orbit by Newton's methods, and this turned out to be 101,300,000 miles - placing the possible center of gravity of the system about 4,800,000 miles BEYOND THE SUN. Later, Malin wrote an imaginative account of the physical appearances which might be expected if there were a brighter and hotter star operating at comparatively close range BEHIND THE SUN, and made drawings to illustrate the writing. Of course, he already supposed that the solar corona and the zodiacal lights were involved. He went deeper into the findings of observation in the reality and compared the real phenomena with his drawings, searching the periodicals and books for new observations, new findings, new information. As the years passed, it became more and more clear that the imaginative phenomena were all present in the planetary system but formed a bewildering chain of scientific mysteries on the strictly sun-centered plan of Copernicus. The scientific situation could all be summed up in the words of the eminent astronomer Simon Newcomb, "The amazing fact that observation has opened up mainly mysteries in the sun; that as a result the world is farther than ever from a satisfactory solution to solar phenomena." Malin had grown up in the Mormon faith, in fact had spent two years as a missionary in New Zealand before he was twenty. Something which might have helped him substantiate the double sun theory in his own mind is to be found in one of the basic books of Mormon - THE PEARL OF GREAT PRICE. The book is mainly a compilation of material which the Mormon founder-prophet, Joseph Smith had translated into English from a scroll of Egyptian papyrus brought to him by a stranger in the 1820's. Among other things in the translation was a group of heiroglyphics, showing humans, birds and symbological figures. One of these symbols Smith interpreted as being "a planet called Kolob, which is directly BEHIND THE SUN." Whether or not this had any influence on Malin's thinking, it is an interesting parallel. In 1931 a booklet, SOLAR ARRANGEMENT, was distributed to the worlds major observatories. It contained drawings which portrayed the Zodiacal body with its light and heat AS A SEPARATE ENTITY BEHIND Page 3 THE SUN from the earth, with all the sun's major "mysteries" DRAWN IN AS NORMAL PHENOMENA. Up to that time, Dr. Fath's spectrum of the zodiacal light had been accepted as a matter of course - indicating that the light consisted MERELY OF REFLECTED SUNLIGHT. The light had long been so much a mystery that very little had ever been written about it in the astronomy books. Within a year, several new spectra appeared from various scientific sources, all of them showing the zodiacal light TO HAVE AN EMISSION SPECTRUM OF ITS OWN, APART FROM THOSE OF THE SUN, the corona and the aurora. (Vangard note...a critical point in this paper, the fact that there were DIFFERENT EMISSION SPECTRA from readings taken from the rim and those taken from the interior surface of the disk) Malin's drawings and text represented the solar corona as being intensely hot in the space AROUND THE EDGE OF THE SUN'S VISIBLE DISK - being the gaseous product of TERRIFIC RADIATION poured out upon the sun's body at comparatively close range FROM A PLACE BEHIND IT. In the years that have followed, the sun, with a measured facial temperature of about 6,000 degrees Centigrade, has been found to be SITTING IN THE MIDST OF ATOMIC CORONAL TEMPERATURES OF A MILLION DEGREES AND MORE.. Incidentally, this leaves the scientists to suppose that they are looking through a million degrees of termperature IN FRONT OF THE SUN when measuring 6,000 degrees Centigrade ON THE SOLAR SURFACE, if they adhere to the SUN-CENTERED IDEA. It may be added, that in their researches of today the physicists USUALLY DISTINGUISH between the zodiacal light area of the SOLAR CORONA (light and radiation radiating from the circumference of the disk) and the SOLAR AREA (across the diameter of the disk). Why would they have to distinguish between the two readings if it is A SINGLE BODY?? Some college professors have found the yearly period on the part of the binary to be impossible, but this is because they have started out by ASSUMING THE SUN TO BE SELF-SUFFICIENT with every other body SUPERFLUOUS. As matters stand, the astronomers and physicists have only to acknowledge that the conditions on and in front of the visible solar disk ARE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from those found in the violent upheaval and gaseous turmoil AROUND ITS "EDGES," and then THE REST WILL FOLLOW as a matter of course, and soon the strictly sun-centered theory will be as obsolete as the epicycles of the earth-centered era. Then our solar system will be acknowledged to have a double sun, WHICH IS THE RULE, NOT THE EXCEPTION in the Universe. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard note... Another incredible chunk of information....There are some Page 4 bizarre things going on with the Sun and the properties of light in space. John Keely says that the Sun and stars are invisible when viewed from space. Light only manifests when in the presence of a gas which serves as a percussive medium for the Aether to allow the generation of light through interference; thereby slowing the Aether to lower frequencies. Rudolph Steiner also says that the Sun and stars are invisible from space. Tom Brown (of Borderland Sciences in California) says he talked on the phone to one astronaut who said they could not take pictures of the Sun or stars UNLESS the camera was inside the ship (where there is air). On hearing this, Tom called NASA and asked the Public Information Officer if the Sun could be seen from space. The PIO said of course. At that point Tom explained about the story he was working on and that he had talked to an astronaut who confirmed the premise of no visible light from space. The PIO got very upset on the phone and said that information was not supposed to be given to the public. We here at Vangard Sciences work from the premise that Aether is the PRIME CONTINUUM or the fundamentally highest possible frequency of this universe. In its division, it produces magnetism, electricity, light, heat, sound, vibration and mass. What if the 2nd sun was a doorway to a dimension of energy which breaks through to sustain this section of space? The channel Hilarion (Maurice Cooke) from Canada offers some interesting thoughts on protons, electrons and the 4th dimension which seem to back up such a contention. He says Protons are escape points from the 4th dimension to the 3rd (where we are). We perceive these points as energy of a higher potential than the normal background level. The rotation is also specific for this polarity. Once this potential exhausts itself, the rotation reverses from that of a proton at which point we perceive it as an electron. Electrons group to develop sufficient energy to create an escape point from the 3rd to the 4th dimension through which to replay the never-ending cycle. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5